Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk tuturan sarkasme dan satire, tindak tutur ilokusi, dan fungsi bahasa terhadap komunitas LGBT dalam komentar akun X @tanyakanrl dan @tanyarlfes. Penelitian ini diperlukan agar tidak terjadi kesalahpahaman dalam penafsiran maksud serta fungsi tuturan sarkasme dan satire sebagai dinamika berbahasa dalam komunikasi daring. Penelitian ini menggunakan kajian pragmastilistika melalui pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa teknik simak bebas libat cakap (SBLC) dan teknik catat, serta metode analisis data berupa padan pragmatis dengan teknik analisis data pilah unsur penentu (PUP). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 58 data yang terdiri atas 8 sarkasme sifat, 8 sarkasme sebutan, 5 sarkasme tindakan, 7 sarkasme hasil tindakan, 5 sarkasme imbauan, 15 satire horatian, dan  satire juvenalian. Tindak tutur ilokusi dalam tuturan sarkasme terdiri atas 1 asertif, 7 direktif, 21, ekspresif, 2 komisif, dan 2 direktif, sedangkan dalam tuturan satire terdiri atas 6 asertif, 7 direktif, 10 ekspresif, 1 komisif, dan 1 deklaratif. Fungsi bahasa dalam tuturan sarkasme terdiri atas 24 personal, 7 regulasi, 1 representasional, dan 1 imajinatif, sedangkan dalam tuturan satire terdiri atas 11 personal, 7 regulasi, 6 representasional, dan 1 imajinatif. Penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya klasifikasi bentuk sarkasme dan satire yang lebih rinci terhadap komunitas LGBT sekaligus relevansinya dengan tindak tutur ilokusi dan fungsi bahasa untuk mengungkap maksud dan tujuan penutur dalam konteks komunikasi. Hal tersebut membedakannya dengan penelitian sebelumnya yang cederung mengkaji berdasarkan stilistika atau pragmatik secara terpisah.

Kata Kunci: sarkasme, satire, tindak tutur ilokusi, fungsi bahasa, pragmastilistika, and LGBT.

This study aims to describe the forms of sarcasm and satire, illocutionary speech acts, and language functions directed at the LGBT community in the comments on X accounts @tanyakanrl and @tanyarlfes. This study is necessary to avoid misinterpretation regarding the meaning and function of sarcasm and satire as a linguistic dynamic in online communication. The research applies a pragmastilistic approach with a descriptive qualitative method. Data were collected through the uninvolved conversation observation technique and note-taking, while data analysis employed a pragmatic identity method with the technique of determining elements (PUP). The results revealed 58 data in total, including 8 sarcasm of character, 8 sarcasm of labeling, 5 sarcasm of action, 7 sarcasm of action results, 5 imperative sarcasm, 15 horatian satire, and 10 juvenalian satire. The illocutionary acts found in sarcastic include 1 assertive, 7 directives, 21 expressives, 2 commissives, and 2 more directives. Meanwhile, in satirical, there are 6 assertives, 7 directives, 10 expressives, 1 commissive, and 1 declarative. Language functions in sarcastic include 24 personal, 7 regulatory, 1 representational, and 1 imaginative. In satirical, the findings include 11 personal, 7 regulatory, 6 representational, and 1 imaginative. These findings present a more detailed classification of sarcasm and satire directed toward the LGBT community and their relevance to illocutionary acts and language functions to express the speaker’s intentions and communicative goals. This distinguishes the study from previous research that tends to focus on either stylistics or pragmatics separately.

Keywords: sarcasm, satire, illocutionary speech acts, language functions, pragmastylistic, and LGBT.