ANALISIS YURIDIS KESALAHAN TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DEFENDANT'S CRIMINAL ACTION OF CORRUPTION IN THE CASE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018

Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 yang dijatuhkan oleh Hakim Mahkamah Agung pada tingkat kasasi putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum seharusnya ditolak karena hasil putusannya baik judex factie maupun judex jurisnya dalam memeriksa perkara tindak pidana korupsi ini tentunya kurang sesuai. Tetapi dalam perkara ini pada tindak pidana korupsi dimana dalam putusan ini, hakim Mahkamah Agung pada tingkat kasasi putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum seharusnya ditolak karena hasil putusannya baik judex factie maupun judex jurisnya dalam memeriksa perkara tindak pidana korupsi ini tentunya kurang sesuai. Tujuan dari penelitian adalah ini  untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim (Ratio Decidendi) MA dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi pada Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 telah sesuai jika dikaitkan dengan unsur kesalahan terdakwa dan perbuatan terdakwa dalam Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 dapat dikualifikasikan dalam ketentuan pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Juncto Pasal 55 Ayat (1) juncto Pasal 64 Ayat(1) KUHP.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif membahas doktrin-doktrin atau asas-asas dalam ilmu hukum.  Hasil analisis penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa Dasar pertimbangan hakim (Ratio Decidendi) dari Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 kurang sesuai jika dikaitkan dengan unsur kesalahan terdakwa dan Perbuatan terdakwa dalam Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 dapat dikualifikasikan terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana melanggar Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana telah diubah dan ditambah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 juncto Pasal 55 Ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP juncto Pasal 64 Ayat (1) KUHP.

Kata Kunci  : Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Putusan Kasasi Nomor 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018.

The basis for the judge's consideration (Ratio Decidendi) in determining the sentence for the corruption case in the Cassation Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 which was handed down by the Supreme Court Judge at the level of cassation to the Supreme Court's decision Number 755 K/Pid.Sus /2018 The Public Prosecutor's cassation request should have been rejected because the results of the decisions, both judex factie and judex juris, in examining cases of criminal acts of corruption are certainly not appropriate. But in this case on corruption where in this decision, the judge of the Supreme Court at the cassation level of the Supreme Court's decision Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 the Public Prosecutor's cassation application should be rejected because the results of the decision are both judex factie and judex juris in examining cases of criminal acts. corruption is certainly not appropriate. The purpose of this study is to analyze the basic considerations of the judge (Ratio Decidendi) of the Supreme Court in the case of corruption in the Cassation Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 is appropriate if it is associated with the elements of the defendant's guilt and the actions of the defendant in the Cassation Decision. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 can be qualified in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes Juncto Article 55 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code This research is a normative juridical law research discussing the doctrines or principles in legal science. The results of the research analysis and discussion show that the judge's basis for consideration (Ratio Decidendi) of the Cassation Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 is not appropriate if it is associated with the element of guilt of the defendant and the actions of the defendant in the Cassation Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018 can be qualified as proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act in violation of Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended and supplemented by Law Number 20 of 2001 in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph ( 1) 1st Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.

Keywords: Basis of Judge's Consideration, Corruption Crime, Criminal Liability, Cassation Decision Number 755 K/Pid.Sus/2018.