Meningkatkan Kemampuan Motorik Kasar Anak Dengan Meggunakan Media Papan Titian Di PPT PUSPA HATI

Improving Children's Gross Motor Ability By Using Football Board Media At PUSPA HATI PPT

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan motorik kasar anak usia 3-4 tahun dengan menggunakan media papan titian.. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) yang dilaksanakan dalam 2 siklus. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelompok B (Kelompok usia 3-4 tahun) dengan jumlah 22 anak. Penelitian dilakukan di Pos Paud Terpadu (PPT) Puspa Hati yang beralamatkan di Jalan Jangkungan 1D No 11, Kecamatan Sukolilo, Surabaya.Data penelitian berupa data tentang kemampuan berjalan diatas papan titian, peningkatan kemampuan motoric kasar dikatakan berhasil apabila prsentas kemampuan motoric kasar anak mencapai 80% dengan kriteria baik.

Hasil penelitian kemampuan motorik kasar Pra Tindakan memproleh kriteria kurang baik dngan nilai rata-rata 48%. Hasil Penelitian Siklus 1 kriteria cukup dengan nilai rata-rata 60%. Setelah dilakukan Tindakan pada siklus 1 telah brhasil mningkatkan kemampuan motoric kasar tetapi belum mencapai indicator keberhasilan shingga diprlukan siklus selanjutnya. Hasil siklus II pencapaian kriteria baik dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 84%

This research aims to improve the gross motor skills of children aged 3–4 years by using balance beam media. The study was conducted using the Classroom Action Research (CAR) method and was carried out in two cycles. The subjects of this research were 22 children from Group B (ages 3–4 years). The research was conducted at the Integrated Early Childhood Education Center (Pos PAUD Terpadu) Puspa Hati, located at Jalan Jangkungan 1D No. 11, Sukolilo District, Surabaya. The data collected focused on the ability to walk on a balance beam. The improvement of gross motor skills was considered successful if 80% of the children achieved good criteria

                     The pre-action results showed that the children’s gross motor skills were in the "poor" category, with an average score of 48%. In Cycle 1, the results improved to the "fair" category with an average score of 60%. Although there was an improvement after Cycle 1, it had not yet reached the success indicator, hence Cycle 2 was necessary. In Cycle 2, the results reached the "good" category with an average score of 84%, indicating successful improvement in gross motor skills