ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1117 K/Pdt/ 2024 TENTANG GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PADA TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI ATAS TANAH

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING NUMBER 1117 K/Pdt/ 2024 CONCERNING UNLAWFUL ACTION CLAIMS IN LAND SALE AND PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS

Dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam menjatuhkan Putusan Nomor 1117 K/Pdt/2024 memiliki perbedaan dengan pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Judex Facti dalam hal jual beli diantara Pihak yang bersengketa. Selain itu, Majelis Hakim ditingkat kasasi tidak mempertimbangkan ataupun mengulas mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum seperti yang terdapat didalam dalil gugatan Penggugat. Berangkat dari hal tersebut membuat Penulis tertarik untuk melakukan analisis mengenai dasar pertimbangan Hakim serta akibat hukumnya setelah dijatuhkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1117 K/Pdt/2024. jenis penelitian yang dipakai yakni penelitian hukum secara normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan kasus (case approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahan hukum didalam penelitian menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Adapun Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang dilakukan dalam meneliti yaitu studi kepustakaan serta menggunakan metode Preskriptif sebagai Teknik Analisa bahan hukumnya. Hasil Analisis terhadap Putusan Nomor 1117 K/Pdt/2024 menunjukan bahwa jual beli antara Penggugat dan Tergugat merupakan jual beli yang sah karena telah memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian dan syarat materi (baik yang mengenai Penjual, Pembeli maupun tanahnya). Selanjutnya, tergugat telah melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum karena melakukan sesuatu yang bertentangan dengan kewajiban yang telah diberikan oleh hukum terhadap dirinya. Akibat hukum langsung bagi Para Pihak adalah diterimanya memori kasasi dan ditolaknya kontra memori kasasi, sedangkan akibat hukum tidak langsung bagi Isnayati (Tergugat) adalah dapat sepenuhnya menguasai objek sengketa dan bagi Ilham Arrasyid (Penggugat) tidak dapat menikmati dan mengelola objek jual beli.

Kata Kunci : Jual Beli, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.

The basis of consideration of the Panel of Judges in handing down Decision Number 1117 K/Pdt/2024 is different from the consideration of the Panel of Judges Judex Facti of the High Court in matters of buying and selling between parties to the dispute. Apart from that, the Panel of Judges at the cassation level did not consider or review the unlawful acts as contained in the arguments of the Plaintiff's lawsuit. Departing from this, the author is interested in conducting an analysis of the basis of the Judge's considerations and the legal consequences after the Supreme Court Decision Number 1117 K/Pdt/2024 was handed down. The type of research used is normative legal research using a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials in the research use primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials used in research is literature study and using the Prescriptive method as a technique for analyzing legal materials. The results of the analysis of Decision Number 1117 K/Pdt/2024 show that the sale and purchase between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is a valid sale and purchase because it has met the requirements of a valid agreement and material requirements (both regarding the Seller, Buyer and the land). Furthermore, the Defendant has committed an unlawful act because he did something that was contrary to the obligations that had been given by law to him. The direct legal consequences for the Parties are the acceptance of the cassation memorandum and the rejection of the counter cassation memorandum, while the indirect legal consequences for Isnayati (Defendant) are that he can fully control the object of the dispute and for Ilham Arrasyid (Plaintiff) cannot enjoy and manage the object of the sale and purchase.

Keywords: buying and selling, unlawful acts.