KEKELIRUAN DAKWAAN PENUNTUT UMUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 143 KUHP DALAM PUTUSAN NO. 63/PID.SUS/2017/PN.PSB TENTANG PENCABULAN PADA ANAK SERTA AKIBATNYA

ERRORS IN THE PROSECUTOR'S INDICTMENT BASED ON ARTICLE 143 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE IN COURT DECISION NO. 63/PID.SUS/2017/PN.PSB ON CHILD MOLESTATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

Putusan No. 63/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Psb dinilai kurang tepat karena dapat menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa pembatalan putusan demi hukum akibat kelalaian Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam menyusun surat dakwaan. Di mana berdasarkan teori tempus delicti tindak pidana tahun 2017 seharusnya menggunakan undang-undang yang berlaku pada tahun tersebut. Namun akibat perbuatan terdakwa justru dikaitkan dengan undang-undang baru sehingga muncul perbedaan masa hukuman antara undang-undang lama dan baru, dan hakim sebagai pemegang kewenangan memutus perkara terkesan membiarkan kelalaian Jaksa Penuntut Umum dengan memvonis terdakwa berdasarkan dasar hukum yang diajukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan analisis bahan hukum primer dan teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan serta analisis preskriptif untuk memberikan rekomendasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan dianggap kurang tepat karena kesalahan penggunaan pasal. Sehingga peneliti merekomendasikan aparat penegak hukum agar lebih teliti dan cermat dalam menangani perkara demi menghindari kesalahan yang berdampak pada pelanggaran asas legalitas dan akibat hukum penting dalam pemenuhan unsur pelanggaran peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.

Decision No. 63/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Psb is considered inappropriate because it can cause legal consequences in the form of cancellation of the decision by law due to the negligence of the Public Prosecutor in preparing the indictment. Where based on the theory of tempus delicti, criminal offences in 2017 should use the law in force in that year. However, as a result of the defendant's actions, it was linked to a new law so that there was a difference in the period of punishment between the old and new laws, and the judge as the holder of the authority to decide the case seemed to allow the negligence of the Public Prosecutor by convicting the defendant based on the legal basis submitted. This research uses normative legal research methods with primary legal material analysis and literature study data collection techniques and prescriptive analysis to provide recommendations. The results showed that the verdict was considered inaccurate due to the wrong use of the article. So that researchers recommend law enforcement officials to be more thorough and careful in handling cases in order to avoid mistakes that have an impact on violating the principle of legality and important legal consequences in fulfilling the elements of violating applicable laws and regulation.