ANALISIS YURIDIS PERKARA HAK ASUH ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR (PUTUSAN NO. 1646/PDT.G/2017/PA.MKS J.O PUTUSAN NO. 17/PDT.G/2018/PTA.MKS)

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF CHILD CUSTODY CASES UNDER AGE (DECISION NO. 1646/PDT.G/2017/PA.MKS J.O DECISION NO. 17/PDT.G/2018/PTA.MKS)"

Pemberian hak asuh anak di bawah umur ketentuannya terdapat dalam Pasal 41 UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Pasal 105 huruf a Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Dalam implementasinya, ketentuan tersebut mengandung ketidakjelasan norma yang menimbulkan perbedaan penafsiran Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan No. 1646/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mks J.O Putusan No. 17/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Mks. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam memutus perkara pemberian hak asuh anak di bawah umur akibat dari perceraian dan memahami akibat hukum adanya Putusan No. 1646/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mks J.O Putusan No. 17/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Mks. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dasar pertimbangan yang digunakan oleh Majelis Hakim dalam memutus perkara hak asuh anak di bawah umur akibat perceraian tidak cukup apabila menggunakan ketentuan dalam Pasal 41 huruf a UU Perkawinan dan Pasal 105 huruf a KHI, namun harus melihat peraturan perundang-undangan lain yang mengatur pemberian hak asuh anak di bawah umur dan mengatur hak-hak anak serta melihat bagaimana fakta dalam persidangan mengenai siapa yang berhak untuk menerima hak asuh atas anak. Akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan tidak menghapuskan hak dan kewajiban orang tua terhadap anak walaupun hak pemeliharaan jatuh kepada Ibu. Kedua orang tua wajib memberikan kasih sayang, mendidik dan memelihara anak-anaknya serta memastikan bahwa hak-hak anak sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. 

The provision of custody rights for minors is regulated under Article 41 of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Article 105 letter a of the Compilation of Islamic Law. In its implementation, these provisions contain ambiguities in norms that lead to differences in interpretation by the Panel of Judges in Decision No. 1646/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mks J.O Decision No. 17/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Mks. The purpose of this study is to understand the basis of consideration by the Panel of Judges in deciding cases of custody rights for minors due to divorce and to comprehend the legal consequences of Decision No. 1646/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mks J.O Decision No. 17/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Mks. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and case approach. The results show that the basis of consideration used by the Panel of Judges in deciding cases of custody rights for minors due to divorce is not sufficient when using the provisions in Article 41 letter a of the Marriage Law and Article 105 letter a of the Compilation of Islamic Law, but it must also consider other legislative regulations that regulate custody rights for minors and the rights of children, as well as examining the facts in the trial regarding who is entitled to custody rights over the child. The legal consequences do not eliminate the rights and obligations of parents towards their children even though custody falls to the mother. Both parents are obliged to provide affection, educate, and care for their children and ensure that the rights of children are in accordance with legislative regulations.