EVALUASI PROGRAM INSTALASI PENGOLAHAN AIR LIMBAH BERBASIS MASYARAKAT DI RT 06 KELURAHAN KROMAN, KECAMATAN GRESIK, KABUPATEN GRESIK

EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED WASTEWATER TREATMENT INSTALLATION PROGRAM IN RT 06 KROMAN KELURAHAN, GRESIK DISTRICT, GRESIK REGENCY

Abstrak

Program Instalansi Pengelolahan Air Limbah (IPAL) merupakan program yang diimplementasikan melalui Program Percepatan Sanitasi Permukiman (PPSP) guna mengentas masalah sanitasi sektor air limbah. Kabupaten Gresik memfokuskan program IPAL di wilayah perkotaan diantaranya Kelurahan Kroman. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengevaluasi Program IPAL di RT 06 Kelurahan Koman dengan fokus penelitian berdasarkan kriteria evaluasi menurut Willian N Dunn yakni: efektivitas, efisiensi, kecukupan, perataan, responsivitas, dan ketepatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan sumber data berupa sekunder yakni observasi dan wawancara serta sumber data primer  berupa dokumen/arsip. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data berupa wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Adapun teknik analisis data berupa model interaktif Miles and Huberman. Hasil penelitian pada Evaluasi Program IPAL Berbasis Mayarakat di RT 06 Kelurahan Kroman yaitu: 1) Efektivitas; dikatakan belum optimal karena pelaksanaan uji kualitas kadar air belum memenuhi Perda dan kurangnya kesadaran Kelompok Pengelola Pemelihara (KPP) untuk merawat IPAL. 2) Efisiensi; pembangunan IPAL dinilai baik karena mendapat bantuan dana dari USRI. Sedangkan biaya operasional belum optimal karena sedikitnya partisipasi masyarakat. 3) Perataan; dikatakan optimal karena pendistribusian program sudah dimanfaatkan masyarakat hampir menyeluruh. 4) Kecukupan; dikatakan optimal karena program IPAL memberikan banyak kebermanfaatan. 5) Responsivitas; respon masyarakat dinilai baik namun kesadaran masyarakat masih kurang. 6) Ketepatan; dinilai optimal karena program IPAL mampu menjadi solusi dalam penanganan masalah sanitasi. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah KPP dan masyarakat sebaiknya mengadakan perawatan IPAL berdasarkan aturan Undang-Undang. Kemudian pemerintah juga perlu meninjau, mengevaluasi, serta memberikan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat.

Kata Kunci: Sanitasi, Evaluasi,  IPAL, Limbah rumah tangga.

Abstract

Installation Program Wastewater Management (WWTP) is a program implemented through the Acceleration Program Sanitation Settlements (PPSP) for use get rid of problem sanitation wastewater sector. Gresik Regency focuses the WWTP program in region urban of them Ward Kroman. Study this aim for analyze and evaluating the IPAL Program in RT 06 Kelurahan Commander with focus study based on criteria evaluation according to Willian N Dunn namely: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, smoothing, responsiveness, and accuracy. Study this use type study qualitative with data source in the form of secondary that is observation and Interview as well as primary data sources in the form of documents/archives. Study this use technique data collection in the form of interviews, observations, and documentation. As for technique data analysis in the form of interactive model Miles and Huberman. Results study on Based WWTP Program Evaluation society in RT 06 Kelurahan Kroman namely: 1) Effectiveness; said not optimal because implementation test quality water level yet Fulfill local regulations and lack of awareness Group Manager Maintenance (KPP) for treat IPAL. 2) Efficiency; WWTP development assessed good because get help fund from USRI. Whereas cost operational not optimal because at least participation society. 3) Alignment; is said to be optimal because program distribution has been utilized Public almost thorough. 4) Adequacy; is said to be optimal because the WWTP program provides many usefulness. 5) Responsiveness; response Public rated good however awareness Public still less. 6) Accuracy; considered optimal because the IPAL program is able to Becomes solution in handling problem sanitation . Suggestion from study this is KPP and Public should stage WWTP treatment based on rule law. Then government also need review, evaluate, and give socialization to society.

Keywords: Sanitation, Evaluation, WWTP, Waste house ladder.