ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TENTANG PERHITUNGAN KOMPENSASI BERDASARKAN ALASAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 131 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024)

ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION ON THE CALCULATION OF COMPENSATION BASED ON THE REASON FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 131 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024)

Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja berarti berakhirnya hubungan kerja karena keadaan tertentu yang mengakibatkan pemutusan hak dan kewajiban antar pekerja/buruh dan pengusaha. Dalam Peraturan perundang-undangan terdapat perbedaan kompensasi berdasarkan alasan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan apakah pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam menetapkan alasan pemutusan Hubungan Kerja sudah tepat dan untuk menganalisis perbedaan kompensasi berdasarkan alasan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penetapan alasan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja kurang tepat karena tindakan Penggugat belum terbukti dalam pengadilan pidana sebagai tindak pidana gratifikasi. Sehingga, penggugat cukup diberi Surat Peringatan saja. Serta Penggugat berhak atas Uang Kompensasi berupa Uang Pesangon, Uang Penghargaan Masa Kerja, Uang Penggantian Hak (Sisa cuti) dan Upah Proses dengan total uang yang didapat Penggugat sebagai Kompensasi yaitu berjumlah Rp. 77.422.422.

Kata kunci: Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Kompensasi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Upah Proses

Termination of Employment refers to the end of the employment relationship due to certain circumstances that result in the cessation of rights and obligations between employees/workers and employers. In legislation, there are differences in compensation based on the grounds for Termination of Employment. The purpose of this research is to determine whether the considerations of the Supreme Court judges in establishing the grounds for termination of employment are appropriate and to analyze the differences in compensation based on the reasons for termination of employment. The research method used in this study is normative legal. The research results indicate that the reason for the termination of employment is not accurate because the actions of the Plaintiff have not been proven in a criminal court as a criminal act of gratuity. Therefore, the plaintiff should only receive a Warning Letter. Additionally, the Plaintiff is entitled to Compensation in the form of Severance Pay, Service Appreciation Money, Compensation for Rights (remaining leave), and Process Wage, with a total amount received by the Plaintiff as Compensation totaling Rp. 77,422,422.

Keywords: Termination of Employment, Termination Compensation, Process Wages