REDESAIN HALTE SUROBOYO BUS RUTE (R1) PURABAYA-RAJAWALI BERDASARKAN PEDOMAN TEKNIS HALTE DAN KEBUTUHAN PENGGUNA HALTE

REDESIGN OF SUROBOYO BUS STOP ROUTE (R1) PURABAYA–RAJAWALI BASED ON BUS STOP TECHNICAL GUIDELINES AND BUS STOP USER NEEDS

Pembangunan halte Suroboyo Bus belum dirancang secara maksimal mengingat fungsi penting halte lainnya adalah sebagai sarana city branding. Tujuan penelitian yaitu mengetahui kondisi eksisting halte Rute (R1) Purabaya–Rajawali, faktor penyebab masyarakat kurang minat menunggu di halte, merencanakan desain ulang halte berdasarkan pedoman teknis halte dan kebutuhan pengguna halte. Metode penelitian yaitu dokumentasi, observasi lapangan, dan survei (kuesioner). Pengolahan data menggunakan Microsoft Excel. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Hasil analisis yaitu tipe perhentian halte ditinjau dari persimpangan mengacu tipe near-side dan far-side. Halte yang belum memenuhi ketentuan mengenai letak halte ke persimpangan 2 halte, letak halte ke fasilitas penyebrangan pejalan kaki 2 halte, letak halte ke gedung yang membutuhkan ketenangan 4 halte serta terdapat beberapa halte di Rute (R1) Purabaya-Rajawali belum memenuhi standar fasilitas halte. Tipe perhentian pada halte Rute (R1) Purabaya-Rajawali mengacu tipe Bus-bay, Lay-bys, dan Curb-side. Hasil analisis sebesar 24%-39% indeks penilaian responden menjawab “tidak puas” dengan fasilitas halte seperti tidak ada tempat sampah, tidak ada CCTV, atap tidak memadai dari cuaca panas maupun hujan, tempat duduk yang kurang nyaman dan jumlahnya kurang, tidak ada rambu petunjuk halte, tidak ada identitas halte, tidak ada papan informasi rute. Hasil redesain halte mengenai jumlah dan aktivitas penumpang adalah Halte Terminal Purabaya (jam sibuk 181 orang, di luar jam sibuk 56 orang), Halte RS Bhayangkara (jam sibuk 24 orang, di luar jam sibuk 9 orang), Halte Ketintang (jam sibuk 35 orang, di luar jam sibuk 20 orang), Halte Embong Malang (jam sibuk 17 orang, di luar jam sibuk 10 orang), Halte Pirngadi (jam sibuk 14 orang, di luar jam sibuk 6 orang).

The construction of the Suroboyo Bus bus stop has not been designed optimally considering the other important function of the bus stop is as a means of city branding. The purpose of the study was to determine the existing condition of the Purabaya-Rajawali Route (R1) bus stop, factors causing people to lack interest in waiting at the bus stop, planning a bus stop redesign based on the technical guidelines of the bus stop and the needs of bus stop users. Research methods are documentation, field observation, and surveys (questionnaires). Data processing using Microsoft Excel. Data analysis using descriptive statistics. The result of the analysis is that the type of stop stop in terms of intersection refers to near-side and far-side types. Stops that have not met the provisions regarding the location of the stop to the intersection of 2 stops, the location of the stops to the pedestrian crossing facilities 2 stops, the location of the stops to buildings that require tranquility 4 stops and there are several stops on the Purabaya-Rajawali Route (R1) have not met the standards of stop facilities. The type of stop on the Purabaya-Rajawali Route (R1) stop refers to Bus-bay, Lay-bys, and Curb-side types. The results of the analysis of 24%-39% of respondents' assessment index answered "not satisfied" with the bus stop facilities such as no trash cans, no CCTV, inadequate roofs from hot and rainy weather, uncomfortable and less seats, no stop signs, no bus stop identity, no route information board. The results of the bus stop redesign regarding the number and activity of passengers are Purabaya Terminal Stop (rush hour 181 people, outside peak hour 56 people), Bhayangkara Hospital Stop (rush hour 24 people, outside peak hour 9 people), Ketintang Stop (rush hour 35 people, outside peak hour 20 people), Embong Malang Stop (rush hour 17 people, outside rush hour 10 people), Pirngadi bus stop (rush hour 14 people, outside rush hour 6 people).