ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM MENGENAI PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA KARENA DIANGGAP MANGKIR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1242 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2020)

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S RULING REGARDING TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT FOR BEING CONSIDERED ABANDONED (CASE STUDY OF SUPREME COURT RULING NUMBER 1242 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2020)

Yohanes Mansri Oncok adalah mantan pekerja CV. Vita Permai yang telah bekerja kurang lebih 12 Tahun, 5 bulan, 12 Hari. Perusahaan melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) terhadap Yohanes Mansri Oncok dengan alasan mangkir, dikarenakan Yohanes Mansri Oncok saat pengambilan cuti tahunan tidak pada saat cuti natal dan tahun baru. Perusahaan tidak memberikan hak pekerja saat terkena pemutusan hubungan kerja. Faktanya terdapat bukti bahwa CV.Vita Permai tidak mengatur tentang ketentuan cuti tersebut pada peraturan perusahaan.Yohanes Mansri Oncok mengajukan gugatan ke PHI. Pertimbangan Hakim menyatakan gugatan Yohanes Mansri Oncok ditolak karena pekerja dinyatakan mangkir sehingga gugatannya ditolak seluruhnya. Selanjutnya, Yohanes Mansri Oncok mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung dan dikabulkan sebagian gugatan Yohanes Mansri Oncok melalui Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1242 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan hukum antara Yohanes Mansri Oncok dengan CV. Vita Permai, serta untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangan hakim atas tidak dikabulkannya permintaan gugatan Yohanes Mansri Oncok  untuk mendapatkan haknya sebagai pekerja yg terkena PHK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yaitu berubahnya status Yohanes Mansri Oncok yang awalnya sebagai pekerja mengundurkan diri akibat mangkir menjadi pekerja yang di PHK oleh CV. Vita Permai akibat melanggar tata tertib dan kedisplinan kerja serta Yohanes selaku pekerja mendapatkan haknya saat terkena PHK sesuai dengan perhitungan Pasal 156 ayat (2), ayat (3) dan ayat (4) UU Ketenagakerjaan.

Kata Kunci: Mangkir, Cuti, Peraturan Perusahaan, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja

Yohanes Mansri Oncok is a former employee of CV. Vita Permai who has worked for approximately 12 years, 5 months, 12 days. The company terminated the employment relationship (PHK) of Yohanes Mansri Oncok on the grounds of absenteeism, because Yohanes Mansri Oncok did not take annual leave during Christmas and New Year's leave. The company does not provide workers' rights when they are terminated. In fact, there is evidence that CV. Vita Permai does not regulate the provisions of the leave in the company regulations. Yohanes Mansri Oncok filed a lawsuit with the PHI. The Judge's consideration stated that Yohanes Mansri Oncok's lawsuit was rejected because the worker was declared absent so that his lawsuit was rejected in its entirety. Furthermore, Yohanes Mansri Oncok filed a cassation application to the Supreme Court and Yohanes Mansri Oncok's lawsuit was partially granted through Supreme Court Decision Number 1242 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2020. This study aims to determine the legal relationship between Yohanes Mansri Oncok and CV. Vita Permai, and to find out the basis for the judge's consideration for not granting Yohanes Mansri Oncok's lawsuit request to obtain his rights as a worker who was laid off. The research method used in this study is normative legal research. The results of the study are the change in status of Yohanes Mansri Oncok who was initially a worker who resigned due to being absent to a worker who was laid off by CV. Vita Permai due to violating work regulations and discipline and Yohanes as a worker received his rights when he was laid off in accordance with the calculation of Article 156 paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of the Manpower Law.

Keywords: Absenteeism, Leave, Termination of Employment