Tindak pidana pencurian merupakan kejahatan yang umum terjadi, seperti hal nya di Bojonegoro tindak pidana pencurian relatif banyak terjadi. Mulai dari kerugian terbesar sampai kerugian terkecil. Banyaknya kasus pencurian yang terjadi maka dibutuhkan suatu lembaga peradilan yang dapat menentukan benar tidaknya suatu perbuatan tersebut. Hakim yang bertugas menentukan putusan terhadap suatu tindak pidana yang berdasarkan pada asas-asas, moral hakim, intelektual dan integritas hakim terhadap suatu rasa keadilan. Di Bojonegoro hakim dalam memutus tindak pidana pencurian rata-rata menjatuhkan hukuman dibawah satu tahun. Semakin banyak kasus pencurian yang diputus oleh hakim di bawah satu tahun maka peneliti merasa penelitian ini penting dilakukan. Penelitian dengan judul, Studi Putusan Nomor 273/Pid.B/2018/PN.Bjn Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencurian Terhadap Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Di Bawah Satu Tahun, memiliki masalah diantaranya Apa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana dibawah satu tahun terhadap tindak pidana pencurian di Bojonegoro.

            Berdasarkan analisis data yang dilakukan bahwa hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana dibawah satu tahun sudah sesuai dengan aturan. Hakim dalam mejatuhkan putusan memperhatikan latar belakang terdakwa, baik buruknya terdakwa, dan kesalahan terdakwa. Hal tersebut sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 5 UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Saran bagi hakim yaitu, dan hakim harus memperhatikan keadilan-keadilan yang dibutuhkan oleh terdakwa dan hakim harus jujur serta berintegritas.

Kata Kunci: Pencurian, Pertimbangan hakim, Pidana ≤ 1 Tahun

Crime theft is a common crime, as is the case in Bojonegoro, criminal acts of theft are relatively common. Starting from the biggest loss to the smallest loss. The number of cases of theft that occur will require a judicial institution that can determine whether or not an action is true. The judge is in charge of determining the verdict of a crime based on the principles, morality of the judge, intellectual and integrity of the judge of a sense of justice. In Bojonegoro, the judges in deciding the crime of theft on average impose a sentence of under one year. More and more theft cases are decided by judges in less than one year, researchers feel that this research is important. Research with the title, Study of Decision Number 273 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.Bjn Regarding Theft of Crimes Against Factors That Affect Judicial Considerations in Imposing Criminal Sanctions Under One Year, has problems including what are the factors that influence the consideration the judge in imposing a criminal sanction under one year for the theft of a criminal offense in Bojonegoro.

This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and a concept approach. The source of the data used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials related to the problem being studied, as well as data obtained from other library materials. The legal material analysis technique is Content Analysis.

Based on data analysis conducted, the judge in imposing criminal sanctions under one year is in accordance with the rules. The judge in passing the verdict paid attention to the defendants background, the pros and cons of the accused, and the defendant's mistakes. This is in accordance with Article 5 of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Suggestions for judges namely, and judges must pay attention to the justice needed by the defendant and the judge must be honest and have integrity. 

Keywords: Theft, Consideration of the judge, Criminal Law ≤ 1 Year