ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' DECISIONS ON CHILDREN AS NARCOTICS COURIER (CASE STUDY OF MATARAM STATE COURT NUMBER 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr)

ABSTRAK

  Penyalahgunaan narkotika pada anak terjadi pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr. Anak bertindak sebagai pengguna, perantara jual beli narkotika Golongan I, dan pelaku penggelapan. Hakim menjatuhkan pidana berupa pembinaan dalam Lembaga BRSAMPK “Paramita” Mataram. Penelitian ini mengkaji dan menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr apa telah sesuai dengan ancaman pidana Pasal 114 Ayat (1) UU Narkotika dan apakah telah sesuai dengan kesalahan terdakwa.

  Tujuan yang hendak dicapai adalah untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr dengan ancaman pidana pada Pasal 114 Ayat (1) UU Narkotika dan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr dengan kesalahan terdakwa.

    Hasil penelitian ini adalah Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Mataram dengan Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr belum sesuai dengan ancaman pidana yang terdapat dalam Pasal 114 Ayat (1) UU Narkotika. Dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Mataram dengan Perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr, anak pelaku bertindak sebagai menjadi perantara jual beli narkotika Golongan I, pemakai dan pelaku tindak pidana penggelapan, dikategorikan dalam concursus idealis. Maka kasus yang diputus oleh Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Mataram perkara Nomor 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr  sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 81 UU SPPA terutama jika mendasarkan pada ayat (5) nya.

 Kata Kunci : Analisis Putusan, Anak, Perantara Jual Beli Narkotika

ABSTRACT

Narcotics abuse in children occurs in the decision of the Mataram District Court Case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr. Children act as users, intermediaries for buying and selling narcotics Category I, and perpetrators of embezzlement. The judge imposed a sentence in the form of coaching in the Mataram "Paramita" BRSAMPK Institution. This study examines and analyzes the judge's considerations in the decision on Case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr whether it is in accordance with the criminal threat of Article 114 Paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law and whether it is in accordance with the defendant's guilt.

The goal to be achieved is to find out the suitability of the judge's considerations in the decision on Case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr with the criminal threat in Article 114 Paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law and to find out the suitability of the judge's considerations in deciding Case Number 26 /Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr with the defendant's guilt.

The results of this study are that the Mataram District Court Judge's Decision with Case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr does not match the criminal threat contained in Article 114 Paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law. In the Mataram District Court Judge's Decision with Case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr, the perpetrator's child acts as an intermediary for buying and selling narcotics Category I, users and perpetrators of embezzlement, categorized in idealistic concursus. So the case that was decided by the Mataram District Court Judge case Number 26/Pid.Sus.Anak/2022/PN.Mtr is in accordance with Article 81 of the SPPA Law, especially if it is based on paragraph (5).

Keywords : Judge's Decision Analysis, Child, Class I Narcotics Intermediary