Pengukuran Eco-Anxiety Dalam Konteks Indonesia: Validasi Skala Hogg Eco-Anxiety 13 Item (HEAS 13)

Measuring Eco-Anxiety in the Indonesian Context: Validation of the 13-Item Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS 13)

Penelitian ini berfokus pada proses translasi serta pengujian validitas dan reliabilitas Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13) agar sesuai dengan konteks Indonesia, sekaligus menilai validitas konkuren dengan Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS). Sebanyak 847 partisipan di Indonesia berusia 17–65 tahun berpartisipasi secara sukarela dalam survei daring.

Berdasarkan hasil Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), ditemukan empat faktor utama, yaitu Affective Symptoms, Rumination, Behavioral Symptoms, dan Anxiety about Personal Impact yang secara keseluruhan menjelaskan 58.3% varians total (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = .906; p < .001). Selanjutnya, hasil Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) menunjukkan bahwa model memiliki tingkat kecocokan yang baik (CFI = .982; TLI = .977; RMSEA = .0417; SRMR = .028).

Koefisien reliabilitas menunjukkan konsistensi internal yang tinggi (Cronbach’s α = .89; McDonald’s ω = .89). Pengujian validitas konkuren mengungkapkan bahwa HEAS berkorelasi positif dan signifikan dengan CCAS (Spearman’s rho = .610; p < .001), yang menunjukkan adanya hubungan konseptual yang kuat antara HEAS dan CCAS. Secara keseluruhan, versi Indonesia dari Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale terbukti valid, reliabel, dan sesuai secara bahasa untuk mengukur kecemasan ekologis pada populasi Indonesia.

This study focuses on the translation process and testing the validity and reliability of the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13) to suit the Indonesian context, while also assessing its concurrent validity with the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS). A total of 847 participants in Indonesia aged 17–65 years voluntarily participated in an online survey.

Based on the results of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), four main factors were found, namely Affective Symptoms, Rumination, Behavioral Symptoms, and Anxiety about Personal Impact, which together explained 58.3% of the total variance (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = .906; p < .001). Furthermore, the results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed that the model had a good level of fit (CFI = .982; TLI = .977; RMSEA = .0417; SRMR = .028).

Reliability coefficients indicate high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .89; McDonald’s ω = .89). Concurrent validity testing revealed that HEAS is positively and significantly correlated with CCAS (Spearman’s rho = .610; p < .001), indicating a strong conceptual relationship between HEAS and CCAS. Overall, the Indonesian version of the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale proved to be valid, reliable, and linguistically appropriate for measuring ecological anxiety in the Indonesian population.