ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 15/PDT.G/2018/PN.NGW. MENGENAI GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM PENENTUAN BESARAN GANTI KERUGIAN  MATERIIL DAN IMMATERIIL ATAS TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN 

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF DECISION NUMBER 15/PDT.G/2018/PN.NGW. REGARDING TORT CLAIMS IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF MATERIAL AND IMMATERIAL DAMAGES FOR THE CRIME OF FRAUD

Penelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan mengenai penentuan besaran ganti kerugian materiil dan immateriil yang diterima oleh Siti Chosiah selaku Penggugat atas tindak pidana penipuan Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil (CPNS) yang dilakukan oleh Mardi. S.S.o.s. MM selaku Tergugat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apa dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menentukan besaran ganti kerugian materiil dan immateriil berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Ngw. yang diajukan melalui gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach, conseptual approach dan case approach. Pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Ngw. Tergugat terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum, sehingga Tergugat harus mengembalikan sisa uang milik Penggugat sebesar Rp.290.000.00,-. Pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim demi keadilan menghukum Tergugat untuk membayar ganti rugi atas kerugian materiil sebesar 1% setiap bulan. Pertimbangan hukum tersebut berbeda dengan suku bunga bank pada tahun 2018 yaitu sebesar 2,9% sampai 6,5%. Hal tersebut menimbulkan adanya ketidakpastian dan ketidakadilan hukum kepada para pihak khususnya Penggugat. Pertimbangan hukum mengenai ganti rugi kerugian immateriil Penggugat menurut Majelis Hakim ditolak karena tidak adanya cukup bukti penghinaan maupun luka berat yang diderita Penggugat akibat perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Tergugat.

Kata Kunci  : Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Ganti Rugi Materiil, Ganti Rugi Immateriil

This research raises issues regarding the determination of the amount of material and immaterial damages received by Siti Chosiah as the Plaintiff for the criminal act of fraud of Civil Servant Candidates (CPNS) committed by Mardi. S.S.o.s. MM as the Defendant. This study aims to analyze what is the basis for the judge's consideration in determining the amount of material and immaterial compensation based on Decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Ngw. filed through a tort lawsuit. This research uses normative juridical legal research methods with a statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Legal considerations of the Panel of Judges Based on Decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Ngw. The Defendant was proven to have committed an unlawful act, so the Defendant must return the remaining money belonging to the Plaintiff in the amount of Rp.290,000,00, -. The legal considerations of the Panel of Judges for the sake of justice punished the Defendant to pay compensation for material losses of 1% every month. The legal consideration is different from the bank interest rate in 2018 which is 2.9% to 6.5%. This creates legal uncertainty and injustice to the parties, especially the Plaintiff. Legal considerations regarding compensation for the Plaintiff's immaterial losses according to the Panel of Judges were rejected because there was insufficient evidence of humiliation or serious injury suffered by the Plaintiff due to unlawful acts committed by the Defendant.

Keywords: Wrongful Act Lawsuit, Material Damages, Immaterial Damages