Kajian Yuridis  Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 Mengenai Perkara Tindak Pidana Pendudukan Kawasan Hutan Produksi Terbatas Secara Tidak Sah

Juridical Study Of The Jurisdiction Of The Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 Concerning The Criminal Action Of The Occupation Of An Unauthorized Residential Production Forest Area

Abstrak

Masri DJ Latinapa pada Mei 2009 menduduki kawasan hutan terbatas. Perbuatannya diatur dan diancam pidana dalam Pasal 50 ayat (3) huruf e Jo. Pasal 78 ayat (5) Undang-undang RI Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan sebagaimana dirubah dengan Undang-undang RI Nomor 19 Tahun 2004 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perubahan Undang-undang RI No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan Menjadi Undang-undang. Sehingga memunculkan Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 memutus bahwa terdakwa terbukti bersalah dan menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama dua tahun penjara dan denda lima juta rupiah. Karena dianggap tidak memiliki izin pelepasan Kawasan dari Menteri Kehutanan. Tujuan dari penelitian  adalah Untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim (Ratio Decidendi) MA pada putusan kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 sesuai dengan Pasal 50 ayat (3) UU No. 41 tahun 1999 dan implikasi Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif. Hasil  pembahasan adalah  Pertimbangan hakim MA (ratio decicendi) terhadap Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 adalah bahwa tanah yang dijadikan objek sengketa merupakan Kawasan hutan milik negara berdasar Surat Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan dan Perkebunan tertanggal 23 September 1999 NO.757/KPTS- II/1999 dan Kepala Desa tidak berwenang mengeluarkan SKPT terhadap tanah berstatus hutan produksi. Implikasinya adalah sebagai yurisprudensi  untuk kasus pendudukan Kawasan hutan produksi secara tidak sah dan sosialisasi dan pemberian tanda yang menunjukkan bahwa suatu wilayah termasuk Kawasan milik negara.

Kata kunci: Putusan Nomor 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 , surat keterangan tanah, implikasi putusan

Abstract

                    Masri DJ Latinapa in May 2009 occupied a limited forest area. His actions are regulated and are subject to criminal penalties in Article 50 paragraph (3) letter e Jo. Article 78 paragraph (5) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2004 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry into Law. Thus, the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 decided that the defendant was found guilty and sentenced him to two years in prison and a fine of five million rupiah. Because it is considered not to have a permit to release the area from the Minister of Forestry. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the basis of the judge's consideration (Ratio Deciden-di) of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 in accordance with Article 50 paragraph (3) of Law no. 41 of 1999 and the implications of the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011. The type of research used is normative research. The result of the discussion is that the Supreme Court judge's consideration (ratio decicendi) on the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011 is that the land used as the object of the dispute is a state-owned forest area based on the Decree of the Minister of Forestry and Plantations dated September 23, 1999 NO.757/ KPTS-II/1999 and the Village Head are not authorized to issue SKPT on land with production forest status. The implication is as jurisprudence for the case of illegal occupation of Kawa-san production forest and socialization and giving a sign indicating that an area is included as a State-owned area.

Keywords: Decision Number 2372 K/Pid.Sus/2011, land certificate, implications of the decision