Penerapan Value Engineering pada Proyek Gedung Pringgodigdo Universitas Airlangga Kampus B Surabaya    

Application of Value Engineering in the Pringgodigdo Building Project Airlangga University Campus B Surabaya

Gedung Pringgodigdo Universitas Airlangga di Kampus B Surabaya merupakan bangunan 14 lantai dengan biaya pembangunan sekitar Rp170 miliar, dirancang sebagai fasilitas pendidikan Fakultas Hukum. Proyek besar seperti ini berisiko menimbulkan unnecessary cost, sehingga penelitian ini menerapkan konsep Value Engineering (VE) untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengurangi pemborosan biaya pada pekerjaan arsitektur. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif melalui lima tahap VE: informasi, kreatif, analisis, pengembangan, dan rekomendasi. Fokus analisis hanya pada pekerjaan arsitektur karena pekerjaan struktur telah selesai dan data MEP tidak tersedia. Metode yang digunakan meliputi diagram Pareto, analisis fungsi, alternatif desain, estimasi biaya, analisis keuntungan-rugi, dan life cycle cost. Hasilnya menunjukkan efisiensi biaya pada pekerjaan pasangan dinding, pintu-jendela dan ACP, lantai, serta plafon dan finishing. Rekomendasi alternatif mampu menghemat biaya tanpa mengurangi mutu dan fungsi memperoleh penghematan sebesar 2,19% atau Rp3.731.114.355.

Kata Kunci : Value Engineering, Konstruksi, Life Cycle Cost, Biaya, Pendidikan

The Pringgodigdo Building at Universitas Airlangga, located in Campus B Surabaya, is a 14-story structure with a construction cost of approximately IDR 170 billion. It is designed as an educational facility for the Faculty of Law. Large-scale projects such as this are at risk of incurring unnecessary costs; therefore, this study applies the concept of Value Engineering (VE) to identify and reduce cost inefficiencies in the building's architectural work. This research adopts a descriptive quantitative approach through five main VE stages: information, creative, analysis, development, and recommendation. The analysis focuses solely on architectural works, as the structural work has been completed and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) data are unavailable. The methods used include Pareto diagrams, function analysis, alternative design development, cost estimation, cost-benefit analysis, and life cycle cost analysis. The results indicate potential cost savings in wall construction, door-window and aluminum composite panel (ACP) installation, flooring, as well as ceiling and finishing works. The recommended alternatives successfully reduce project costs without compromising quality or functionality, resulting in a total saving of 2.19% or IDR 3,731,114,355.

Keywords: Value Engineering, Construction, Life Cycle Cost, Cost, Education.