ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 202/PID.SUS/2024/PN. MTR TENTANG NON-CONSENSUAL INTIMATE IMAGES VIOLENCE

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATIONS IN RULING NUMBER 202/PID.SUS/2024/PN. MTR ABOUT NON-CONSENSUAL INTIMATE IMAGES VIOLENCE

Non-consensual intimate images violence adalah kekerasan dengan pengambilan dan penyebaran konten intim tanpa konsen disertai pengancaman. Penyebaran konten intim dilakukan pelaku saat mengambil gambar intim tanpa konsen yang digunakan sebagai alat untuk mengontrol korban agar mau menuruti keinginan pelaku. Hal tersebut merupakan motif tindak pidana terdakwa sehingga dapat dijadikan pertimbangan hakim memutus perkara sebagai alasan pemberat. Tujuan penelitian dilakukan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dari aspek yuridis, non yuridis, keadaan yang memberatkan dan meringankan pada Putusan Nomor 202/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mtr serta perlindungan hukum korban non-consensual intimate images violence. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konsep. Teknik pengumpulan dengan studi pustaka dan dianalisis dengan metode preskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menujukkan hakim dalam memutus perkara pidana Putusan Nomor 202/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mtr tidak mempertimbangkan aspek non yurisdis mengenai motif latar belakang korban melakukan penyebaran konten intim di sosial media. Perlindungan hukum bagi korban non-consensual intimate images violence lebih tepat menggunakan UU TPKS.

Kata Kunci: Non-Consensual Intimate Images Violence, Pertimbangan Hakim, Perlindungan Hukum. 

Non-consensual intimate images violence is violence involving the taking and distribution of intimate content without consent accompanied by threats. The perpetrator spreads intimate content when he takes intimate pictures without consent which is used as a tool to control the victim so that they comply with the perpetrator's wishes. This is the motive for the defendant's criminal act so that it can be used as a consideration by the judge in deciding the case as an aggravating reason. The aim of the research was to determine the judge's considerations from juridical, non-juridical aspects, aggravating and mitigating circumstances in Decision Number 202/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mtr ​​as well as legal protection for victims of non-consensual intimate images violence. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a case approach and a concept approach. The collection technique uses library research and is analyzed using prescriptive methods. The results of this research show that the judge in deciding the criminal case Decision Number 202/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mtr ​​did not consider non-jurisdictional aspects regarding the victim's background motive for spreading intimate content on social media. Legal protection for victims of non-consensual intimate images violence is more appropriate using the TPKS Law.

Keywords: Non-Consensual Intimate Images Violence, Judge's Consideration, Legal Protection.